What this is. A live demo of the EW-AiRM™ Assessment Tool. Pick a tier below to see how the assessment depth changes with organisational exposure. Answer the questions to generate a board-level snapshot of AI risk posture.
What this is not. The production tool runs 109 questions across the four EW-AiRM™ layers. This demo shows a curated subset — enough to evaluate the method and to teach it, not enough to substitute for the full assessment.
The Five Non-Negotiables
These five conditions apply at every tier. Any one of them at a failing status overrides the composite score and forces an F-Critical posture — the framework does not let a poor Non-Negotiable hide behind a good Risk Posture Index.
Strategic Layer
Six pillars covering the governance decisions made before and around AI deployment. Production tool: 66 questions across 27 assessment dimensions. This demo shows up to 8.
HAiPECR Ethical Filter
Seven dimensions (Human oversight, Accountability, inclusivity, Privacy, Explainability, Conduct, Responsibility) applied across all three EW-AiRM™ layers. Production tool: 21 questions. This demo shows up to 8.
Operational Layer
Risk identification built on the MIT FutureTech AI Risk Repository (7 domains, 24 subdomains). Production tool: 10 questions plus the four-quadrant risk register. This demo shows up to 3.
Resilience Layer
Eight AI Black Swan categories: low-probability, high-consequence events that traditional risk registers miss. Production tool: 12 questions plus the resilience governance framework. This demo shows up to 3.
Board-Level Snapshot
What the production tool adds
This demo shows the question logic and the output. The production EW-AiRM™ Assessment Tool is a working instrument built for evidence, audit, and the boardroom. Everything below is in the full version and deliberately held back here.
The full question set
All 109 questions across the four layers, each with a reference code (for example SL/PL1/AD2/Q3), an applicable-tier marker, and a cumulative “expected at this tier” maturity descriptor.
Cumulative tier scoring
A Yes / No response, then a tier-specific maturity selection. Tiers are cumulative: an Enterprise assessment carries the Core and Standard questions beneath it, scored as one.
Override & audit trail
Every auto-calculated risk can be overridden with a mandatory comment. Overrides are flagged (OVR) and retained, so the assessment carries its own defensible audit trail.
Formal exclusions
Criteria that genuinely do not apply can be formally disabled, each with a recorded rationale, so the score reflects scope rather than silent omission.
Risk fingerprint
The Board Report renders a risk fingerprint: every assessed criterion as a colour-coded cell, so the whole posture reads as one signature you can compare across time, business units, or AI systems.
Board & detailed reports
A board-ready report and a full detailed report, each generated from the live data, with radar dashboards for the portfolio risk profile and the risk profile by layer.
F-Critical override
Any Non-Negotiable at a failing status overrides the composite score and forces an F-Critical posture. Governance basics cannot be averaged away.
Export, offline, private
Export to Word, PDF, or JSON. A single self-contained file: no install, no server, no cloud. The assessment never leaves the device it runs on.
Excel sibling
A companion scoring workbook with 485 transparent formulas, for audit and procurement teams who want to see the calculation rather than trust it.