Implementation consulting

Implementation support for teams
that own AI risk.

Board Advisory is for the board and the sign-off. Implementation Consulting is for the risk, compliance and technology teams who have to make EW-AiRM™ work day to day, inside systems and processes that already exist.

Discuss an engagement

SERVICE LINES

Four ways we work with you.

Framework implementation

Standing up the three-layer architecture inside an existing risk function: mapping current controls against the MIT AI Risk Repository and the 831-control Mitigation Database, closing the gaps, embedding the five non-negotiables into existing policy rather than bolting on a parallel process.

HAiPECRTM embedding

Building the pre-deployment filter into an organisation's actual change and deployment pipeline, so it's a working gate engineering and product teams use, not a document risk keeps in a drawer.

Control library build-out

Working through the Risk<>Controls Master Map against an organisation's specific AI systems, producing a tailored control set rather than the generic 831.

Ongoing coaching

Regular working sessions with the risk, compliance or technology team responsible for AI governance day to day, for as long as it takes for EW-AiRM™ to become how the team already works rather than an external framework applied to them.

How does this differ from Board advisory?

Board Advisory works with the board and audit committee: sign-off, appetite statements, independent challenge on specific deployment decisions.

Implementation Consulting works with the team beneath that: building the systems, controls and working habits that make those sign-offs meaningful in the first place.

Larger engagements often use both, in sequence — diagnostic and board input first, implementation consulting second.

Who is Implementation consulting for?

A risk, compliance or technology function that has AI governance responsibility but not yet the structure to discharge it:

a first-time AI deployment with no existing framework to extend,
a function that has tried to build its own taxonomy and found it does not scale, or
a team preparing for a specific regulatory deadline (EU AI Act Article 50 compliance is a common trigger) with a hard date attached.

ENGAGEMENTS

"Frameworks that cannot be operationalised
are not frameworks."

Regulated banks & fintechs

Including systemically important institutions.

Insurance, asset management, capital markets

Buy-side, sell-side, and intermediary firms.

Sovereign & standards bodies

National authorities, regulators, and standards organisations.

Start with a 30-minute conversation.

No deck. No sales script. Tell us the problem, and we will tell you whether we are the right people to help.