ATUS - US Department of Labor Statistics AI Questions

Screenshot of the report on the EW-AiRM Response to the US Department of Labor Statistics AI Questions

๐—ช๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—œ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€:
๐—ช๐—ฒ ๐—ท๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—บ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ธ

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics is proposing something no statistical agency in the world has done: adding Artificial Intelligence questions to the American Time Use Survey (ATUS), linking AI use to a continuous 24-hour record of people's actual days (91 FR 42775, OMB 1220-NEW).

Adoption surveys tell us whether people have tried AI. A time diary tells us how much, for which tasks, and instead of what. For anyone managing AI risk inside an organisation, that second set of facts is the one that matters.

The Human Ai Instituteยฎ has today submitted a formal public comment applying Enterprise-wide AI Risk Managementยฎ (EW-AiRMยฎ) ewairm.com to the proposal, authored by our Founding Director, Prof. Markus Krebsz.

Our position is one of strong support, with ten specific recommendations. Four stand out:

๐Ÿ”น ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—”๐—œ. One question, asking whether the AI tool used for work was employer-approved or the respondent's own, would produce the first nationally representative estimate of unsanctioned workplace AI use. Every enterprise governance framework currently has to assume this number. BLS could let us know it.

๐Ÿ”น ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป. Did people check AI outputs before using them? Time spent verifying is the hidden denominator of every AI productivity claim, and no national survey anywhere measures it.

๐Ÿ”น ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ, ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ. The 2027 to 2028 fielding window of two years will span the mainstreaming of AI agents. A module designed around "chatting with an AI" will misdescribe 2028.

๐Ÿ”น ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ฝ. AI is disappearing into ordinary software faster than respondents can recognise it. Instrument the drift; do not pretend it away.

Our submission also makes a point we believe applies to every AI collection now being designed worldwide: national statistics are the missing denominator of enterprise AI governance. Organisations, insurers and regulators are currently calibrating against vendor marketing surveys. BLS can replace that foundation with statistics.

As one of our EW-AiRMโ„ข Governance Maxims puts it: "Governance that looks right is not the same as governance that works." The same discipline applies to measurement.

See our submission here:
https://enterprisewideairiskmanagement.grigora.app/usatus/